Practice Groups
- Administrative Practice and Governmental Affairs
- Appellate Practice
- Automotive Dealers
- Bankruptcy and Creditor Rights
- Commercial Real Estate
- Commercial, Complex, and Class Action Litigation
- Construction Law
- Corporate and Business Practice
- Corporate/Public Finance and Securities Law
- Economic Development
- Education
- Environmental Law
- Estate Planning and Probate
- Federal, State and Local Taxation
- Financial Services
- Foreclosure, Real Estate and Commercial Loan Workouts
- Healthcare (Business and Regulatory)
- Healthcare and Medical Liability
- Insurance Defense and Coverage Law
- Intellectual Property
- Labor and Employment Law
- Media Law
- Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Mergers, Acquisitions, and Dispositions of Businesses
- Nonprofit and Tax Exempt Organizations
- Pharmaceutical, Biologic, and Medical Device Litigation
- Products Liability
- Professional Liability and Licensure Matters
- Tax Credits
- Utility and Energy Law
Offensive and Defensive Summary Judgment in Favor of RSJG Client/Insurer Affirmed on Appeal
In a case involving the non-payment of insurance premiums under an assigned risk worker’s compensation policy, Evans Bailey and Ron Davenport successfully argued for an offensive and defensive summary judgment in favor of their client, a national insurance company. The trial court found that the insurer was not only entitled to the premiums that had not been paid, but also that the defendant’s counterclaims alleging fraud and various other torts against the insurer and its alleged agent were not viable. The Alabama Court of Civil Appeals affirmed the trial court’s decision on appeal without an opinion on June 14, 2013.