Practice Groups
- Administrative Practice and Governmental Affairs
- Appellate Practice
- Automotive Dealers
- Bankruptcy and Creditor Rights
- Commercial Real Estate
- Commercial, Complex, and Class Action Litigation
- Construction Law
- Corporate and Business Practice
- Corporate/Public Finance and Securities Law
- Economic Development
- Education
- Environmental Law
- Estate Planning and Probate
- Federal, State and Local Taxation
- Financial Services
- Foreclosure, Real Estate and Commercial Loan Workouts
- Healthcare (Business and Regulatory)
- Healthcare and Medical Liability
- Insurance Defense and Coverage Law
- Intellectual Property
- Labor and Employment Law
- Media Law
- Mediation and Alternative Dispute Resolution
- Mergers, Acquisitions, and Dispositions of Businesses
- Nonprofit and Tax Exempt Organizations
- Pharmaceutical, Biologic, and Medical Device Litigation
- Products Liability
- Professional Liability and Licensure Matters
- Tax Credits
- Utility and Energy Law
Bailey and Davenport Receive Summary Judgment for Insurer in UM/UIM Coverage Dispute
Evans Bailey and Ron Davenport recently won a summary judgment in the Middle District of Alabama on behalf of their client, an insurer, in a coverage dispute involving UM/UIM benefits. The district court agreed with Evans and Ron’s position that there was no coverage for UM/UIM benefits because the proposed insured was not a “resident relative” of the policy holder. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Bieber, No. 2:15-CV-475-KS-GMB, 2016 WL 3672216 (M.D. Ala. 2016)